It is crucial to have the ideal approach to make sure that someone understands the author’s intended meaning or goal for the post, whether they are reading to relax while sipping coffee, learning more about current events around the globe, or establishing a connection to their community. Since they lack the skills to critically evaluate news sources presenting viewpoints that differ from their own, many prefer to utilize those that support their beliefs. Eventually, people start to believe that their beliefs are correct, making them less ready to attempt to see issues from a new perspective. This can become troublesome over time. People can come to better-educated conclusions about their true feelings about issues if they have been exposed to a variety of viewpoints by starting to read articles from various websites that offer diverse thoughts. Having completed the course, I can now read some new stories differently, in that I can analyze an article with ease.
I learned a better and more effective method and technique from this course, enabling me to comprehend how to read and analyze an article. I now have the confidence and knowledge necessary to confront any source, whether it uses the same logic as mine or something entirely different. This is thanks to the reading I did for the course. The course has been very beneficial in ensuring that I now have better justification for issues, mostly historical ones. Different texts explain the events differently depending on the author’s justification.
The author relies mostly on assumptions that there may be discrepancies between these groupings due to diverse ideals and desires held by various groups (Much). This article shows that the author bases his assumptions on the familiarity of the Israeli-Palestinian relations in general. This benefits the author’s logic in writing and analyzing the topic under discussion in the article. The author analyzes the problems using historical data from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict dates back to the middle of the 20th century and has persisted. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is regarded as one of the world’s oldest and most contentious disputes. These two factions are clamoring for control of the same land, which causes the current activity. As a result, the two stats and the people, in general, have been significantly impacted by and affected by the fight.
The exodus of the Jewish people and the sectarian strife between Jews and Arabs in Mandatory Palestine may have contributed to the beginning of this conflict. The war is evident in the article in that it reflects on the most intractable conflict in the world (Lecture, 09.16.2021). The Ottoman Empire dominated the Middle East, which includes Palestine, for around 400 years before World War I. At the end of the 19th century, Palestine, which at the time had been divided into three main groups that included the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, the Syria Vilayet, and the Beirut Vilayet, was inhabited primarily by Arab Muslims, including Beduin and farmers, with a sizeable percentage made up of Christians, Jews, Druze, and Circassians as well (Isseroff, par 10). The majority of them were primarily located in central and eastern Europe. The Middle East, the Mediterranean, and America were home to the largest Jewish populations.
The Zionist-Arab Conflict is well articulated in the article. Ideally, The author showcases an accurate analysis of the conflict., The author analyzes that Arab nationalisms and Zionism were among the nationalist movements that gained traction in the 19th century (Much). For a very long time, the Jewish faith has emphasized their ambitions related to their return to Zion. The aspect is evident in the article in that it bases on the Jewish population, especially in Middle and Eastern Europe. The article analyzes more on how Jews began to talk more about their immigration to Israel and, more importantly, focused on re-establishing their nation between 1859 and 1880 (Much). This solved the widespread persecution of Jews due to Europe, anti-Semitism, and Russia. The outcome, in this case, was the Zionist movement. This contemporary movement was created and regarded as a political movement that began in 1879 and centered on building a homeland in consideration of the Jewish people (A Brief History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, par 8).
Establishing a nation-state for its people, particularly in Palestine, was the main goal of the Zionist movement. This nation-state was seen as a representation of heaven for all Jewish people, particularly in Palestine and around the world. It would grant its citizens the rights that would guarantee and prioritize self-determination. Zionists eventually believed that the state should be regarded as a historic land and the land of Israel (The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, par 6).
One of the earliest instances of fighting occurred in Safed in 1882 during a wedding when a guy who was an Arab was accidentally shot and killed. About 200 Arabs arrived at the Jewish villages in this case as retaliation, and they attacked them with rocks, causing extensive property damage. More Jews had been murdered by 1908, primarily by Arabs. Zionist ambitions have grown, and leaders among the Arab population in most of Palestine’s territories have seen them as a danger (The Middle East Peace Process, par 5). In addition, several developments involved buying property from Arab proprietors of Jewish villages. The outcome of this dispute was the expulsion of the fellaheen from their property, where they had been tenant farmers for a long time. Consequently, tensions between the two governments and groups grew, and Palestine felt their lands had been abandoned. Jews and Arab Muslims have historical claims to this territory, which has led to ongoing and escalating hostilities (Lecture, 09.28.2021). Other than that, the fight that began long ago may have some acute effects and implications.
Idealistically, the Arab Palestinians opposed the UN’s dividing of the land, giving the bulk of it to the citizens of a Jewish state, now Israel. Giving 55% of the land to the majority Jewish population of Israel raised concerns from the Palestine Arabs. At the time of the partition, Jews only possessed 10% of Palestine’s total land area (Gelvin, par 8). They said that the property was originally theirs and was now being handed to immigrants from outside due to Adolf Hitler’s persecution in other regions of Europe (Riddell, par 12). Since the Palestinians had long-term control over the region and had observed a large-scale Jewish influx, their claim was legitimate.
The Israelites insisted that the area belonged to them because it was the location of their original settlement. Additionally, they had been given the region by British colonialists who decided to settle them there following the unfortunate occurrences that had occurred elsewhere in Europe (Carter et al., par 9). Jewish leaders had been promised a permanent homeland in the region bordering Palestine by British Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour. It was permitted for others from Europe to immigrate and dwell among individuals who had been in the region for many generations. Due to their extensive history of habitation in the region, the Israelite claim had some basis in truth.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been linked to several international organizations, resulting in the problem’s current state. Because they were committed to providing the Jews with a permanent haven, the British were the key protagonists in this situation (Schaeffer, par 6). Additionally, they permitted Jewish immigration from other European countries, which the locals found objectionable.
Additionally, the United Nations is responsible for the war as it exists now. As they were the ones that split 55% of the land to the Jewish immigrants, the United Nations was accountable for the division that resulted in the giving of the bulk of the territory to the Jews (Caplan, par 7). The cold war influenced the tension between the two areas. The United Nations was a tactic utilized by the United States to limit Soviet dominance in the area. To increase their power in the area and gain Israel’s support, the Soviet Union backed up, establishing a Jewish state (Carter et al., par 8). Israel, despite being neutral, relied only on American financial assistance, and its condemnation of North Korea severed its ties to the Soviet Union. While a result, the Soviet Union established diplomatic relations with Palestine and provided technical and financial support to the local forces as they were prepared to combat the Israeli population.
Israel and the Palestinians have engaged in four wars. The first is the Palestinian conflict, with Israel’s destruction as its goal. It ended the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and was followed by Palestine’s struggle to establish an independent state alongside Israel. Israel fought the third conflict to protect its 1967 border (Anthony et al., par 9). Israel fought the fourth and final conflict for a more prominent Israel to defend its settlements and all of the seized lands. Because the battles are, in some ways, concurrent, it isn’t easy to place a timeframe on them.
The principal effects of the four wars in the area were the death toll and property damage. The number of Palestinian refugees increased and is now close to 940,000. (Anthony et al., par 3). Israel’s size increased by around 21% due to another shift in the territory. A commitment to communication between the two nations can end the dispute. The nations should come to an understanding of the ground principles for the conflict resolution process. The city of Jerusalem should also remain accessible to everyone on both sides of the border (Lecture, 09.01.2021). The issue between the two states should be resolved by designating the city as the World City. Since the city was once home to Christians, Muslims, and Jews, all religions should be welcome at the city’s religious institutions. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict would have been resolved as a result.
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict started in the middle of the 20th century and was clearly stated in the article as a continuing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Based on the story, Jews and Muslims have common characteristics. They are both vengeful, fight for what they feel is rightfully theirs and their beliefs are strictly focused on their teachings. However, no one has a strict history of the two religions. The history we have learned so far is in line with what the article talks about the Jews and Muslims. The migration of Jews from various areas of Europe to Palestine and the sectarian strife between Arabs and Jews in Mandatory Palestine may be traced as the causes of the war. The main points of disagreement between the two countries include, among many other issues, mutual recognition, territory, water resources, the management of Jerusalem, and Palestinian freedom of association. Based on the article, the author’s view on Zionist-Arab colonists is very accurate in that it bases on facts such as the cause of the war.
A Brief History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. (n.d.) The New York Times. Web.
Anthony, C. Ross, Charles Ries, Craig Bond, Daniel Egel, Jeffrey Martini, Liepman Andrew, Steven Simon et al. “The Costs of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” (2015). Rand Corporation.
Lecture. (2021). Muslim-Jewish Encounters fall 2021.mp4.
Much, Afif Abu. “Israeli Minister Advances Israeli-Palestinian Airport Near Jerusalem”. Al-Monitor: Independent, Trusted Coverage Of The Middle East, 2021.
Caplan, Nunez. “The Israel-Palestine conflict: contested histories.” (2011). John Wiley & Sons.
Carter, Judy, George Irani, and Vamik D. Volkan. “Regional and ethnic conflicts: Perspectives from the front lines.” (2015). Routledge.
Gelvin, Louis. “The Israel-Palestine conflict: One hundred years of war.” (2014). Cambridge University Press.
Isseroff, Alexander. “Brief History of Palestine, Israel, and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (Arab-Israeli conflict, Middle East Conflict).” (2019). Mideastweb.org.
Lecture. (09.01.2021). Jerusalem.mp4.
Lecture for 09.16.2021.mp4.
Riddell Schild. “A Contemporary Examination of Canada as an ‘Honest Broker’in the Israel-Palestine Conflict.” (2018).
Schaeffer, Robert. “Partition of Palestine; In Understanding globalization: The social consequences of political, economic, and environmental change.” (2003). Rowman & Littlefield.
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. “1948 to the Present Day.” (2013). Web.
The Middle East Peace Process. “Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection.” (2015). Web.